As students return for the 2026–2027 school year, students may have noticed the effects of PHS’s implementation of new technology rules and changes, including a transition to Gmail, new site blockages, and the return of Visigo Agent and GoGuardian.

Earlier this year, former NJ Governor Phil Murphy signed into law S3695, which called for the creation of a bell-to-bell phone ban in New Jersey public schools, leaving it up to each district on how exactly they would enforce it.

In addition to banning phones from 8:20 a.m. to 3:21 p.m., one of the options that PHS has chosen is Doorman, an app that restricts device usage by placing a lockdown on apps, such as social media or text messaging, during school hours.

“It was the high school making the decision to use Doorman. From a tech perspective, we thought it was a promising solution. [However, we] had to restrict the network from student personal devices in general,” said PPS Chief Technology Officer Todd MacDonald.

Doorman has encountered some pushback from students, however. Many students have not downloaded the app, stemming from a myriad of reasons.

“I don’t feel like I need to use my phone during a school day. But I also have some privacy concerns. I don’t like the idea of an app having full control over my phone,” said John Patrick-Aguilar ’29.

The transition toward these new applications is also an attempt to streamline management of data in the school and will save money for the school in the long-term.

“We’re trying to unify the system around a single platform. And Google is a much more modern platform,” said MacDonald. “The management tools are a lot simpler.”

Due to the state cell phone ban, sites which are considered social media, such as Twitter, Reddit, or Pinterest, have been blocked in order to accommodate the law. In addition, to follow district protocol that AI may not be used on an assignment unless teacher-directed, AI platforms which were previously available have now also been blocked for students.

To facilitate this change, GoGuardian is replacing Mosyle Manager. GoGuardian works by blocking site categories and offering teachers the ability to monitor student screens live. Parents are also able to access student browsing activity. Some students report more websites being blocked in comparison to last year.

“The only real effect of GoGuardian was not being able to find a PDF of a book I wanted to read, or a SparkNotes of it, but that’s it. [There isn’t really a] difference between Mosyle Manager and GoGuardian in my opinion,” said Joshua Dong ’29.

Additionally, the school district has applied changes focused on the shift away from technology. As outlined in a letter from PPS Superintendent Michael LaSusa, policies such as a quarterly “unplugged” day and a “lids closed” laptop policy in school have also been implemented this year.

At this time, it is unknown whether or not GoGuardian and Doorman will continue in their current form, but these changes will likely remain a part of PHS life.

Photo: Katherine Chen

John Bathke reprimands Marina Zappa do Valle Tuler ’27 for phone usage.

Technology Office institutes changes to comply with state law

Today, AI and other modern tech innovations have completely changed the modern work standard, bringing great productivity increases — and even greater fears of falling behind into the  eternal cycle of poverty. To attempt to escape these fears, young adults are pursuing what they perceive to be the only path to success in this ever-changing world: grind culture. Grind culture, defined by the belief that the only path to monetary success is constant hard work, long hours, and complete availability, has become a widespread ideology. Although these qualities may seem beneficial to a person’s career, the fearmongering that grind culture encourages, alongside its mental health harms, renders it a detriment to society. 

Recently, young people are facing numerous economic challenges: housing, fuel, groceries, utilities, education, and healthcare costs have all skyrocketed. Grind culture is, in many ways, a response to the increasing unaffordability of life: survival only comes from working hard all the time. However, constant effort most often results in burnout, anxiety, and lowered productivity — making it counterintuitive for young adults aiming for financial stability. 

Though inflation-adjusted salaries have largely remained stagnant since 1960, purchasing power has severely declined amongst younger generations. If one worked hard in previous generations, there was a foreseeable reward, but currently, it has become nearly impossible to buy a home, especially if one is on the federal minimum wage ($7.25/hour). Home prices are just one example of the disparate financial realities between the oldest and youngest generations. 

Grind culture uses fearmongering tactics to convince people that if one does not follow this lifestyle, they will suffer from an unaffordable world for the rest of their years. The idea of the “permanent underclass,” a future where artificial intelligence replaces human labor, while the world is ruled by elites, only exacerbates these fears by promoting a dystopian future. If the stakes are permanently being subjugated, one would be much more willing to follow the lifestyle grind culture emphasizes.

Another motivation to be employed in high-stress, high-paying professions is student debt, composed mostly of federal student loan debt. Federal student loan debt can almost never be discharged through bankruptcy and will dog a person’s footsteps for the rest of their lives. When coupled with interest rates, student loan debt is a major barrier for millions of Americans to financial security.
 
Thus, the increasingly widespread goal of working in professions such as investment banking or consulting is a product of the desire to become financially secure. Both of these careers require incredibly long hours and little work life balance, embodying much of the grind culture. While this may be worth it to those who are simply seeking more wealth, the vast majority of professions do not require the grind culture mentality to be successful. 

Especially with the increases in corporate mass layoffs, trust and loyalty to companies is at a very low point. Working hard for a company no longer produces the same results, with millions of people being laid-off annually. 

Instead of glorifying grind culture as a mindset encouraging young people to work hard, we should regard it as the manifestation of all our unfounded fears — the idea that success is fleeting and that permanent failure is always just one step away.

It’s not wrong to want to work hard and chase an A on a test, or attempt to win a competitive internship, but it can become a vice when it gets excessive. There is more to life than schoolwork or any job. Unlike what grind culture assumes, one bad grade, a slightly lower paycheck, or even being laid off long-term can be recovered from, but trading away your health, time, and satisfaction, is something you can never regain. No one aspect of life should dominate all others: balance is necessary for proper happiness and joy.


Kanishk Mogha's Work