**Cheers:**

Take Your Child to Work Day; USC Mind ice bucket challenge; Kickstart energy drink; cold brew; SZA & Kendrick Lamar Grand National Tour 

**Jeers:**

AP season, humid air, litter, running out of pencil lead, expensive review books, school tissues, nosebleeds, performative activism

Cheers and Jeers: April 2025

Walk into any grocery store in America, and you’re bound to find shelves full of ultra-processed foods wrapped in shiny plastic packaging. Ultra-processed goods, products that are prepared using industrial methods, are often high in sugar, salt, and fat. For these reasons, many health professionals and critics on social media have taken to advocating for consumption of “whole” foods such as fruits and vegetables. Although reaching for an apple is decidedly healthier than grabbing a bag of chips, both foods can be sources of a less-discussed health threat — microplastics.


Microplastics are defined as small pieces of plastic less than five millimeters long, and result from the natural degradation of plastic products, such as packaging, synthetic textiles, and paint. Since the coinage of the term “microplastics” in a 2004 University of Plymouth study, its negative effects on marine organisms have been well-established. However, microplastics aren’t just a problem for our environment — they have begun to find their way into the foods that we consume on a daily basis.


For example, a 2020 study by Catania University discovered that carrots and apples contained high levels of microplastics, likely due to absorption of microplastic-contaminated water. Additionally, according to a National Institutes of Health study from 2023, tea bags made with certain plastics can release billions of very small microplastics into cups of tea. Marine organisms consumed by humans can also have thousands of larger microplastics, and any foods stored in plastic containers contain thousands of plastic particles of all sizes. When consumed, these microplastics have been shown to mimic hormones, messenger chemicals within the body. One study from the American Chemical Society found that a gene called TRPV4 was over-expressed due to microplastics acting as growth factors, leading to respiratory issues. Microplastics can contribute to an increased risk of cancer, neurological diseases, and respiratory issues. They also exacerbate pre-existing medical issues, or activate latent disease-causing genes in the body. 


In particular, many of the microplastics in humans arise from a process known as biomagnification. Because of pollution, there are many plastic particles floating in the ocean. Small organisms eat these plastics, and they are then consumed by predators. The plastics move up in the food chain, becoming more and more concentrated in the tissue of the apex predators. When a human proceeds to eat this animal, they receive a portion of the many microplastics present in the ocean. Biomagnification occurs in a similar sense for land animals like chickens and cows, which often consume contaminated plants. In all cases, the original source of microplastics are man-made materials that pollute the environment.


This is not a problem that can be solved through selection in what we eat, but instead needs to be solved at its origin. We fill our oceans with trash, destroying the single geographic feature that gave rise to all life. As a society, we need to change to save our planet, our oceans, our marine life, and ourselves. Large societal shift begins with small, personal steps. Right here at PHS, students can make a meaningful impact in the fight against microplastic pollution. From the cafeteria to the vending machines, we make daily choices that either contribute to or help combat this growing health and environmental crisis. 


If you want to stay away from these life-threatening, cancer-causing particles, start by putting your water bottles in the recycling. The next time you go to the cafeteria or Tiger Café, choose items with less plastic packaging. Bring your own reusable water bottle instead of purchasing plastic beverage bottles from the vending machine. Even small changes like using your own reusable utensils or avoiding plastic straws count. These changes may seem insignificant, but together, we can reduce sources of microplastics that end up in our food, and in our bodies.

Photo: Julia Li

Izzah Memon ’27 eats a bag of chips during break.

Microplastics are a macro problem

The lunch bell rings at 11:33, and fourth period ends as hundreds of students pour out of classrooms and into the halls of Princeton High School. Some students head to the library, while others head to the guidance office. Some just walk laps — earbuds in, heads down, skipping lunch for the third, maybe fourth day in a row. It is not a diet. It is not a protest. It is not always a choice. 


For too many students, lunch has become optional. Not because they are not hungry — they are — but because 35 minutes is not enough time to eat, finish an essay, ask a teacher a question, and review for the quiz they have next period. In the past few years, there has been an unhealthy exaggeration of high school performance and how it affects the futures of these students. Because of this, when given the choice between nourishing the body and “getting ahead” in their studies, the choice seems trivial.


This is not just a PHS problem. According to a 2020 national survey by Yale University, 75 percent of high school students report having negative feelings toward school. The general sentiment seems to be that these students feel negatively towards school because of apathy or laziness. The truth, though, is that these students are under copious amounts of stress, driving them to have these negative feelings.


A New York Times article written by Tim Donahue stated that “we [as a society] have pushed high school students into maximizing every part of their days and nights.” Students feel like they need to do more and more in order to stay afloat. Self-care takes a backseat because students feel like they need to do so much in order to distinguish themselves. They need to get perfect grades, take the hardest classes, be a part of every extracurricular under the sun. Of course, under all of this pressure, physical needs become an afterthought.


The way students cope with this stress is not always visible — but it is often unhealthy. Skipping meals, sleeping in fragments, and studying at midnight. It becomes a game of sacrifice: what can be dropped to make room for everything else? For too many, the answer is lunch. A study from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that students given less than 20 minutes to eat consumed significantly less food and nutrients. When the body is not given the nutrients it needs to function properly, productivity drops. This, in turn, harms students’ academic performance.
When students are skipping meals just to keep up — when they feel they have to choose between eating and succeeding — something is wrong with the system, not the student.


We need to stop pretending that this is normal.


Lunch should not be a luxury. It should not be treated as expendable. It is time — real, uninterrupted time — to eat, decompress, exist as something other than a GPA.


So the questions posed are, how do we take back our lunch periods? How do we take our lives back from the grind that academia has instilled in us? There is no single fix, but there are places to start — both as individuals and as a school.


At a school-wide level, the goal should not just be more time. It should be better use of the time we already have. Lunch needs to be protected. No required meetings, no mandatory makeups, unless a student chooses them. The school can also help by making lunch more accessible — a pre-order system or even a simple form could cut down the lines that push students away. And if we are serious about student wellness, the message needs to be loud and clear: eating and resting are not optional, they are essential. Teachers and administrators should say that out loud. Not just in emails during Mental Health Week, but every day, in how they schedule, how they speak, and what they prioritize.


But change cannot just come from the top. It starts with what we do, too. That might mean bringing food from home instead of skipping lunch. Taking ten minutes to sit down and actually eat. Using free periods to slow down instead of squeezing in more. Outside of school, it means setting boundaries — around sleep, around work, around the pressure to always do more. And maybe most of all, it means shifting how we think. Getting the perfect grades and getting into a top college are not the most important things in your life. More than that, needing rest does not mean you are failing. Taking care of yourself is not weakness — it is proof that you are still trying to live, even in a system that tells you to do the opposite.


So when the lunch bell rings at 11:33, you do not need to run. You can stop. You can eat. You can let that be enough.

Photo: Julia Li


Ksenia Petukh ’27 eats lunch and studies in the IDEAS Center.

Lunch is for eating, not cooking

Bridget McAloon '27: "It has to be Kinder Buenos. I'm a sugar fiend."


Priya Bakshi '25: "I just like to chew gum ... I think it helps me concentrate."


Ian Lee '28: "I like to eat chips while I'm studying ... Doritos, Lays."


Lile Kapanadze '26: "Red Bull ... because it's an energy drink and it helps me study."

PHS Speaks Out: What is your favorite study snack?

“Stop GENDER DISCRIMINATION in debate,” reads the cover slide of the hit 2024 Instagram post by the Debate Hotline. This particular post collected (at the time of writing this article) a whopping 2,164 likes and 247 shares, making it probably one of the most notable moments of feminist activism in the high school debate space in recent years. 


Any debater with an Instagram account would likely recall the viral impact of this post. Across my feed, debaters of all genders shared the post, creating a powerful moment of solidarity. This moment mirrored activism in other competitive academic spaces — from the #WomenInSTEM movement addressing gender gaps in mathematics competitions to the Women’s Chess Initiative highlighting similar disparities in chess. Nonprofit organizations have proliferated across these disciplines, each focused on promoting gender equality in their respective activities. In debate specifically, feminism has become perhaps an integral movement. Yet despite this widespread activism, gender disparities persist across all these academic spaces. In mathematics, women still represent less than twenty-five percent of International Mathematical Olympiad participants. In chess, women account for just eleven percent of rated players worldwide. In debate, the disparity remains since the viral post. This raises a critical question that transcends any single discipline: Is our current approach to addressing gender discrimination in academic competitions actually effective?


To approach an answer, we can examine the Debate Hotline post and how the debate space handles inclusive activism. The post features quoted testimonies from female debaters describing misogynistic social encounters they have experienced: “At the Harvard tournament, I advanced in out-rounds. When a male friend of mine found out, he congratulated me by saying ‘have my babies,’” recounted one anonymous submission. Beyond these accounts, the post presents three key statistics: women are 18.8 percent less likely to win Varsity elimination rounds, 30 percent more likely to quit debate altogether, and notably absent from half of all national circuit finals. They end with a call-to-action urging debaters to sign a petition that demands the NSDA to implement mandatory judge bias training. 


The message of the post reflects the message of the overall feminist movement in debate: biased judging leads to female debaters losing rounds, which drives them out of the activity, ultimately hurting their academic and life opportunities. This rhetoric also follows through in Fem-Kritiks, a popular argument (usually made by female debaters) that urges the judge to drop the opposing team (usually male), and for the opposing team to forfeit the round. This is done in order to even out the win-loss disparity by addressing judge bias.


The problem with this widespread rhetoric is that it is only partially true; a closer look at Yi and Nie’s 2020 study “An Empirical Study of Gender Differences in Competitive High School Debate” reveals something crucial. In Varsity rounds, the study found “a large difference in win rates between teams of different gender compositions, with female-female teams 17.1 percent less likely and male-female teams 10.0 percent less likely to win a debate round against male-male teams.” However, they also found “no gender gap in win rates for novice debaters.”


If the thesis of female push-out being due to judge bias is to be believed, why is there no sex disparity in novice round results? The study follows this discovery by suggesting that “the disparity does not occur from innate entry ability differences, but rather appears alongside experience in debate.” In the results section, Yi and Nie continues that “some possible causes of this gap result from a female debater’s environment: potential bias in the amount of resources allocated to competitors by coaches, the gender-hostile environment of a team, or the effect of the perceived stereotype of the activity, to name a few examples.”


This pattern extends beyond debate and into other competitive academic spaces. Chess, for instance, has implemented structural solutions by creating women-only sections and tournaments since 1927. Yet despite these institutional changes, the gender disparity in chess still exists today. The underlying cause mirrors what we see in debate, which is a hostile social climate. Female chess players consistently report implicit exclusion from the broader chess community, which pushes them out from participating. In many academic environments, female participants describe being excluded from study groups, having their contributions minimized, and facing heightened scrutiny of their abilities. These experiences, not competition results alone, ultimately drive many talented women away despite their proven capabilities.


Although misogyny and other forms of inequity is a systemic problem in academic spaces, we need to stop focusing on that — however counterintuitive it sounds. Exclusively deeming the issue to be systemic is how we arrived at our current position. It removes responsibility from the individual. If you are someone who cares about and wishes to solve inequality in the academic space, it is time to address the issue on a personal level: how you deal with and react to hostile situations. Have you stood up for others? Have you excluded team members from resources? Have you actively denounced crude, inappropriate behavior? Have you stopped perpetrators from participating in leadership? 


I’m not demeaning current feminist initiatives. Their focus on institutional change remains important. But perhaps we need to focus elsewhere; perhaps our activism has become too copy-paste, too shallow, too performative; perhaps we need to look elsewhere, deeper, within ourselves. Our efforts must address the social climate that shapes our activity from within, not just the institutional structures above. While continuing to advocate for structural change, let’s recognize that creating truly inclusive spaces begins with us.

Why inclusive initiatives are failing in the academic space

 It is well-accepted that the sense of American security collapsed along with the World Trade Center back in 2001. From a country dazed and confused, the War on Terror began, and, soon enough, our generation was born: a population hyper-aware of and sensitive to instances of terrorism.

The September 11 attacks certainly dwarfed any instance of non-war violence that the United States had seen in the preceding decades — but terrorism did not start in the twenty-first century. Many students may remember learning about John Brown, who killed several pro-slavery expansionists and attempted a raid on Harpers Ferry to further the cause of abolition. Brown became a Union martyr in the years following his execution, and even today, many don’t necessarily deem him a terrorist.

To better understand Brown’s case, consider the definition of terrorism: an act of violence against non-combatants for a political aim. Non-combatants are everyday civilians who are not directly partaking in hostilities, while combatants are the actors in the conflict. Besides a simple semantic separation, this implies a distinction between the right to protection held by each group. Supposedly, the United States conducts war — an action justified in that it kills people who chose to fight — and its enemies conduct terrorism — an action unjustified in that it kills people who chose nothing. Brown never killed a truly “neutral” person, neither from his perspective nor ours today, because for both, to defend slavery constitutes such an abhorrent belief that it becomes violent by nature. But for the wider view of his day, abolition had become so polarized as a political issue that “neutrality” in its matter meant simply not engaging in physical violence for the cause.

Therefore, complications arise when evaluating who truly counts as a combatant. Somewhere between John Brown’s raid and the September 11 attacks may lie someone like Ted Kaczynski, otherwise known as the Unabomber. In Kaczynski’s manifesto, he detailed his fear that modern technological advancements would trigger a world without nature, human freedom and dignity. By mailing bombs to university professors conducting STEM research, airline executives, and advertisers, Kaczynski acted upon his extreme political opinions. With knowledge on the extent of global warming, Kaczynski might have very well argued that the everyday choices of Americans to use ecological resources such as gas and electricity and water, made them combatants against the Earth itself, which he defended.

The question of who is a combatant has come to a larger stage in the trial of Luigi Mangione. Even without any legal determination as to whether or not he murdered United Healthcare CEO Mark Thompson, Mangione has become a folk hero for his alleged action. To his defenders, the insurance CEO is responsible for the violent action of causing people to suffer unmanageable healthcare fees, whereas Luigi, if guilty, is only a victimized soldier in the class warfare that the rich started. The prosecution, meanwhile, sees a man murdered for doing his legal job and a terrorist responsible for that murder.

What made these cases compelling and generally socially accepted? Figures such as John Brown, Ted Kaczynski, and Luigi Mangione based their actions off of well researched, passionately defended ideological positions that tapped into public grievances. Their targets were not random but individuals seen as combatants responsible for systemic issues, whether it be slavery, the degeneration of humanity, or healthcare inequality. Their actions were not intended to instill fear into the general public but rather a distinct resistance towards a combatant.

In a community like Princeton, where student activism is often passionate and socially conscious, it’s important to ask: how do we define resistance, and where do we draw the line between protest and violence? While we don’t condone acts of harm, we can reflect on the motivations behind historical and controversial figures to understand how they were able to make people so deeply moved by injustice. PHS activists can learn that effective change comes not just from emotion, but from informed, strategic action that taps into shared concerns and presents compelling narratives.

What we can learn from controversial figures

President Trump’s recent funding cuts to colleges and public schools has hit especially hard here in Princeton, a town internationally recognized for its high standards of education. The government has cut many research grants at Princeton University as well as colleges and universities across the U.S., and it is currently threatening to pull funding immediately from public K-12 schools if they do not eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

The shutting down of the DOE impacts Princeton in various ways. The DOE enforces the implementation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (commonly referred to as a 504 plan), a federal civil rights law that protects the rights of individuals with disabilities in programs receiving federal funding. In particular, Section 504 formally outlines accommodations and support services for students with disabilities, such as allocating extra time for testing. Without 504 plans, students who need these plans may not be given them, leading to them not succeeding as much as they could because their right to accommodations was taken away.

These decisions have already faced mass pushback from many in the nation, including in Princeton. Hundreds of students, professors, and Princeton community members congregated by the Princeton Public Library on April 5, partaking in the national wave of protests on “Hands Off Day,” with over 1,200 other rallies all over the country. Gatherers protested Elon Musk and Trump’s efforts to pull funding from various government initiatives, such as Medicaid, Social Security, and the Department of Education (DOE).

With these developments, access to education is becoming a privilege and democracy is deprioritized. Since 1979, the DOE has fought for students’ rights, advocating for inclusion of female, disabled, LGBTQ, and all minority students. With the Trump administration slashing 50% of its workforce, the DOE  is likely to fade away as a central authority in maintaining standards for equitable and quality education. Every school is impacted, especially those in rural or under-resourced communities.  

If education is no longer a civil right, high educational standards are now a privilege reserved for the highest tax brackets and the wealthiest zip codes. By trading educational standards in the name of “government efficiency,” we are quickly letting go of the American principle of opportunity and upward mobility.

 Our education system should strive to dismantle systemic barriers. The Trump administration’s policies certainly will make it so that inequality will become institutionalized in the one place that ought to provide an equitable launchpad to the real world. While some students receive shiny, new, updated textbooks and modern labs, others that are less fortunate will be struggling to learn with outdated materials and crumbling infrastructure.

The social inequalities that fester unchecked in society will bleed into schools and dismantle the educational promise of equal opportunity. If we are serious about upholding our ideals of equal opportunity, and if schools are meant to be a stepping stone to our future, education can not be relegated to a gamble. 

To the government: thank you for proving to us that you are willing to jeopardize the education of millions of capable, smart, and ambitious American students. Thank you for proving that you do not care for improving equality. We hear you loud and clear. 

Stop putting education in budget cuts

Cheers and Jeers

   Having a tutor does not guarantee success. That is the mistake too many students make. The assumption goes like this: if you are struggling in a class, hiring a tutor will fix everything. A tutor will reteach the material, clarify confusion, and help you complete assignments. If you sit through lessons, understanding will come eventually. But that is not how learning works.


Students who rely on tutors as a safety net — thinking they can check out during class because they will “just relearn it later” — are setting themselves up for failure. A tutor is not a replacement for active engagement. They are not an alternative to thinking for yourself.


PHS students know this pattern too well. You can walk into the IDEAS Center on any given afternoon and see tutoring sessions happening at nearly every table. Some students are asking questions, engaging in discussion, and working through problems themselves. Others sit back, listen passively, and nod as if absorption was automatic. Then, they go home, take the test a few days later, and are surprised when their grade does not reflect all those hours with their tutor.


The reality is that success depends on active learning. That means asking questions in the moment, staying engaged with the material, and making an effort before seeking outside help. It means attempting the homework before assuming you need a tutor to walk you through it.


Tutors are not a shortcut. They should be a supplement: a way to refine understanding, clarify difficult concepts, and receive guidance on problem areas. The students who see real results from tutoring are the ones who already engage in class, who struggle first before seeking help, and who come to their tutor with specific questions instead of waiting to be spoon-fed the material. PHS offers plenty of resources for students: teachers who hold office hours, peer tutoring programs, and the IDEAS Center. However, none of it matters if students refuse to take the initiative themselves. The bottom line? If you are zoning out in class, thinking your tutor will handle it later, you are wasting time — yours, your tutor’s, and your teacher’s. The real work happens in the classroom. Tutors can help, but only if you are willing to help yourself first.

Photo: Charley Hu
Stellan Song ’28 and Vinay Lele ’28 study together in the IDEAS Center.

Tutors are not shortcuts to success

Conversations at PHS are often embedded with strings of expletives, which occasionally result in teachers warning students about their language. This seemingly normal occurrence demonstrates that although profanity has become desensitized for younger generations, it still carries weight for the older population and in professional environments. According to a paper from the International Journal of Literature, Language, and Linguistics (IJLLL), a survey comparing Generations X, Y, and Z reported that only 4 percent of Generation Z respondents reported no use of profanity, contrasting with a larger 43 percent of Generation X participants. Despite this disconnect between profanity and past generations, most popular curse words have deep historic roots and come directly from the Middle Ages.


According to the Saturday Evening Post, profanity in medieval times mostly revolved around religion and eventually became associated with immodesty. These examples allude to a greater trend in profanity — historically, profanity matches the needs and desires of its users and the society it exists in. For example, general profanity revolved around racial slurs in societies where racial discrimination was a norm. Today, what we define as profanity is once again changing, and it will likely cause a rift between Generation Z and older generations such as Generation X. For example, the word “damn” was considered a serious profanity in the 16th century. However, in the modern era, its profane nature has more or less dissipated. For instance, The New York Times and other major print publications have loose regulations surrounding the printing of  “damn” in article titles, but will only include the word “f—” in “highly contentious quotations and interview transcripts”. The IJLLL paper found that Generation Z is more likely to use profanity light-heartedly or in casual conversation. Words currently still generally considered profane, such as “f—” or “s—,” may join “damn” and quickly lose that designation if they continue to be used in normal contexts.


   In contrast to “damn,” certain words have had their profane statuses elevated. The r-slur, which began as a professional medical term for neurodivergent people, quickly became common profane vocabulary. After various social movements pointed out the r-slur’s derogatory nature towards neurodivergency, it began to be considered as a slur. Its slur status was then solidified in 2010 when President Barack Obama signed “Rosa’s Law,” which changed “mental retardation” to “intellectual disability.” It’s likely that the next wave of profanity will not be any new, strange words, but rather a revival of what is currently considered unacceptable. For example, most PHS students have likely heard at least one slur in the hallways. Offensive slurs such as the f-slur and the r-slur that have been phased out of popular vocabulary seem to be making a worrying comeback. Interestingly, this coincides with the rise of conservatism among U.S. youth alongside racism, misogyny, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. These ideas and associated slang spread quickly in the fast-paced digital age, contributing to the loss of meaning for otherwise offensive words.


It is important to recall, though, that these changes in profanity are generally concentrated in younger generations. Older generations are less likely to change their perception of words they have always known as profane. This results in a generational language gap — when younger generations casually use words older generations may still perceive as highly hurtful, it can cause conflict. In the workplace, which many PHS students are only years away from entering, this dissonance could have particularly negative effects. Although curse words being used more casually isn’t inherently negative, it is important for younger people to remember that language does not change at the same rate for everyone.


As we, the younger half of Gen Z, begin to enter the professional sphere and transition into a world where we are not always mostly surrounded by our peers, we should start to be more mindful of our words — we will need to communicate effectively with other people, and profane language, although more casual for young people, is intrinsically divisive.


Traditional curse words are losing their meaning for younger people as they use them as casual terms, not as expressions of significant emotion. These developments should be taken seriously, as they will not only create far-reaching professional and interpersonal consequences, but could also accelerate the use of bigoted slurs in common conversation. Although these linguistic developments seem out of our hands, by consciously making an effort to remove profanity from our vocabularies, we can still make a difference.

The evolution of profanity

What was once a level playing field for athletes has
become a marketplace. Modern college athletics has
reached an all-time high in popularity, becoming a
multimillion dollar business built on the backs of athletes
who have received nothing for their performance.
Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) is an NCAA policy
that allows college athletes to earn their own money
through branding. This policy prevents brands from
misrepresenting athletes or using them to promote their
brand without consent. It also allows them to earn cash
for brands they choose to represent, eliminating the issue
of the NCAA’s lack of compensation. Some opportunities
for student athletes to make money through NIL include
autographs, merchandise, blogging, commercials, and
more. As of 2021, college athletes can make money
with the NIL, but some consequences such as wealthier
schools gaining more power and student athletes losing
focus from their monetary trade have been producing a
net negative impact on college sports.
Compared to last year's 200 players, more than
1700 athletes in men's college basketball entered the
transfer portal on its first day of opening because of
their inability to make money and earn recognition
in the current colleges they attend. This eliminates a
feeling of school loyalty and prevents smaller schools
from building better athletic programs, as they are
consistently losing their players to the bigger schools
with deeper pockets. Because of the branding, schools
with publicized athletes will compete more
often and in high-level tournaments, while
schools with less publicized athletes with the
same or better skill may not have the chance
to compete in these tournaments, as selection
depends on what the audience wants to see.
Still, many incoming college athletes look
forward to these opportunities.
“I think it would be great to be paid for
sponsoring someone and use my image to
promote their brand. It would be nice to have
extra cash for college,” said Sean Wilton ’25, a Brown
commit for shot put.
The ability for student athletes to promote their brand
and receive payment in college has been a debated issue
long before the NIL was passed, specifically because
supporters of NIL believe that student athletes should
earn compensation for what they accomplish. However,
opponents of the NIL believe that college freshmen
are simply not responsible or experienced enough to
handle these large sums of money. Still, the NIL was
officially introduced and passed in 2021. In recent
years, well-funded powerhouses have poached recruits
from smaller colleges with a much higher salary. These
temptations are slowly turning the focus of college
sports away from what they were originally, which was
for athletes to improve and be able to perform their best.
At first, the limelight and extra cash earned through
NIL policies may seem to benefit student athletes, but
over time, it has harmed them. These well-funded
schools are also more attractive to recruits looking for
colleges, creating situations where student athletes are
choosing schools for the money, rather than what is the
best fit for them. Not only does this create a negative
culture, but it also often results in going “one and done”
through college, meaning they go to school for only 1
year without graduating to immediately pursue their
sport professionally. This leaves athletes in difficult
situations if they are plagued by injury or other careerending issues and do not have a college degree to choose
a different career.
Schools without branding and NIL money don’t
get the same chance to recruit better players
and be shown more to a national audience.
Therefore, athletes who want to be recognized
for their talents and make a cash surplus must
attend colleges with highly publicized athletes.
These well-funded schools ultimately make
student-athletes into athlete-students. Despite
the benefits of NIL, some athletes are finally
seeing the downsides.
“I think right now [NIL’s] actually impacting
them for the worse,” said Wilton. “It is hurting
more athletes than helping them in some way.”
To prevent conflicts such as unfairness and loss of
focus, players and coaches could push for NCAArecognized restrictions on NIL. One potential solution
could be to implement a NIL budget for every school to
abide by, regardless of size or wealth, similar to a salary
cap in the NFL and NBA. Additionally, policies could
be used to regulate player agreements with NIL deals,
such as a loyalty clause, where students must stay with
a school they commit to for at least 2 years, to ensure
both the school and the athlete have equal benefits. This
proposition would not only create an equality amongst
colleges and universities in terms of NIL usage, but also
give college players a better overall college experience.
The initial intentions of the creation of NIL were
morally correct in the sense of giving college athletes
what they deserve for their hard work, given the
amount of money the industry makes. However, there
have been many hidden flaws that could have serious
negative effects on college athletes' experiences as they
go through their careers. This requires action against the
current forms of NIL, and restrictions need to be made
before college athletics are changed forever. If college
sports continue to uphold this negative culture, school
spirit and built-up talent will be replaced by business
proposals and short-term gains, leaving behind the true
meaning of the game. 

The dark side of NIL

The crowd holds their breath as Jacqueline Zang ’25, with her driver in hand, steps
up into the tee box of the first hole. She carefully chooses a spot to place her tee and
golf ball. Visualizing her shot, Zang takes a confident swing, influenced by her favorite
professional golfer, Nelly Korda. Her shot breaks the crowd’s silence as it flies through
the sky and lands perfectly on the green.
At age five, Zang began playing golf after her father introduced her to it. She initially
only played golf with her family, but later in her career, she would compete in big
tournaments.
“I used to play tennis, and
when I was around 11, my
parents told me to choose one
or the other,” said Zang. “It’s
funny, because I didn’t want
to do tennis because my dad
told me I’d be running around
in the heat. So I chose golf not
because I liked one more than
the other, [but] just because I
didn’t want to run.”
After deciding to pursue
golf over tennis, Zang went to
her local country club’s driving
range and practiced with her
sister, Madeline Zang ’23. When they practiced, they would mutually help and encourage
one another, along with the additional coaching from their father.
“November through March, I try to do around an hour a day. Sometimes, I skip a few
days. In the summer, if I’m not playing a tournament that weekend, I’ll be practicing
five to seven [hours],” said Zang.
Zang joined the PHS golf team in her freshman year, when golf was a co-ed sport
led by Head Coach Patrick Noone and Assistant Coach Jess Monzo. During Zang’s
sophomore year, a girls-only golf team was formed with Monzo as head coach. Over
the course of the past few years, Monzo has been able to see Zang grow as a player
and a person.
“She’s definitely matured a lot. She’s always been very focused, very lights out,” said
Monzo. “[She] knows what she wants to do, but I think as she’s gotten older, she’s
developed and kind of matured in the sport and understands that if I don’t make every
shot, it’s not going to make or break me.”
Zang’s determination and dedication not only helped her reach her current level
but also inspired the rest of her team, including teammate and close friend Kyuyoung
Chung ’26.
“She’s definitely very skilled as a golfer, and so I think that’s definitely inspired a lot
of the girls to practice more,” said Chung. “We’ve seen scores go down from last year,
so score-wise we’re doing better than we did last year.”
In addition to being a skilled golfer, Zang, who is captain of the team, serves as a
leader and role model to her teammates.
“She also has this sort of leadership [quality] about her, and so she’s just sort of
someone you can look up to, [and]
I certainly look up to her,” said
Chung.
Monzo witnessed the effect of
Zang’s leadership on the team and
how she serves as a role model for
her teammates.
“Every girl looks up to her,” said
Monzo. “She’s able to kind of help,
and she lends a hand, and she’s
always available to give girls advice.
So she’s been one of a kind.”
Throughout her career, Zang
qualified for the National Junior
PGA championship, the highest
level of junior golf, being inducted
into the Rolex Honor Society, and
placing in the top five in an American Junior Golf Association tournament in 2022.
Despite this, there were challenges that Zang had to overcome. Staying calm under
pressure and controlling emotions are both aspects of the sport that Zang has learned
to play with.
“[The most difficult part of] golf for me [is] probably the mental side. Just being
in the moment, committing to it, and actually doing what I’m trying to do on the
course,” said Zang.
While individual golf can be mentally challenging and stressful, Zang’s favorite part
of golf is a more enjoyable and less stressful way of playing it.
“[My favorite part] ... is team golf because golf is an individual sport, so it can get
kind of lonely sometimes,” said Zang. “Everyone plays their own ball, and then you
add up each individual sport for a combined team.”
Committed to Carnegie Mellon University, Zang hopes to contribute to another
season as one of their best players. As she prepares to leave PHS and start college, Zang
reflects on the valuable lessons golf has taught her throughout her years of playing.
“It’s a lot of ups and downs. It’s never really consistent, so when you’re not playing
as well, [be] patient with yourself, and keep your hard work up,” said Zang.

Photo: Charley Hu

Zang is one of the original members of the girls golf team, and is preparing with the
rest of the team to gear up for the Mercer County Championships in May. 

Jaqueline Zang ’25: golf

## Alex Riera

Alex Riera ’25 enrolled in Mercer County
Technical School’s (MCTS) horticulture
and turf care management program at the
suggestion of her mother, who thought that it
aligned well with her interests in nature and
the outdoors. Riera, who will be graduating
from the 2-year program in June, is now
glad she enrolled.


“Taking care of plants or growing them…
[it] does help you mentally. I’ve had an
experience when we were planting tomato
seeds, and we had these containers filling
in the soil. I just remember it felt really
satisfying,” said Riera.


The program prepares around
20 students annually for careers
in landscape and agriculture industries — helping with everything
from securing horticulture
internships to technical skills.


“[We use] equipment like mowers,
turf riders, string trimmers, weed
whackers…we [also] identify plants
and weeds…and how to get rid of them. And
we’re introduced to different ways to get rid
of them, like pesticides or using bugs, for
example, [which] benefits the plants and is a
better way of getting rid of them,” said Riera.


Riera’s favorite part, however, has been
entering horticulture competitions and
conventions around the state with a team
of two other students from MCTS.


“[For] the Monmouth State convention,
we had to do a [presentation] on soil pH, soil
levels, and the importance of NPK (nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium). The first time
I was introduced to it, I [thought] I would
never [be able to] do it and I wouldn’t be able
to memorize these scripts…[my instructor]
was willing to help me through that and gave
me a lot of time to practice. It’s something
I never imagined I could do,” said Riera.


Riera only attends MCTS on Friday
afternoons this year. In the morning Riera
has classes at PHS, and in the afternoons
(with the expectation of Friday) Riera is
employed as a florist at McCaffrey’s as a part
of MCTS’s internship program.


“It was a long process, but I got [the
internship]. They make sure that the
coordinator comes to check on me if
everything’s okay [or] if I have any concerns.
And I’m like, ‘No, I’m doing well. This is a
great experience, and I’m very grateful to be
in it,’” said Riera.


Riera is also involved in Future Farmers
of America, an organization that supports
education in agriculture. Riera developed
the agenda for the organization’s 2024-25
programs and sold over 100 holiday wreaths
with the organization.


This fall, Riera will enroll in
Rutgers’ horticulture program,
a dream that she says was made
possible with the support of MCTS.
In particular, she plans to explore
her passion for horticulture therapy.


 “I’ve had so many great experiences
[at MCTS], and I’ve learned so much
about horticulture,” said Riera. “In
my [college] essay, I wrote about my
experience at [MCTS]. It really made a huge
impact on me.”

## David Lux-Betata

David Lux Beteta ’26 is enrolled in three
automotive programs at MCTS: Diesel
Technology, Automotive Technology,
and Auto Collision Technology. Through
MCTS, he’s learned how to assess damage,
repair vehicles, secure internships, and use
tools and equipment found in real-world
auto shops.


Beteta has been fascinated
with cars since his childhood,
and recalls deciding to go into
the automotive industry after
watching the Fast and Furious
films as a child.


“You would think it gets
frustrating… but it’s something that I’ve
always wanted to do, and I enjoy it. The rush
of ideas in your head… just disappears, and
you just kind of lock into the project that
you’re doing — that’s what I found myself
getting into,” said Beteta.


Beteta, like many oteer MCTS students,
juggles both in-class instruction and a paid
internship at a local auto shop, which he
also receives school credit for.


“There’s a range from staying in the
classroom — doing paperwork, [filling]
orders — to in the shop, [where] we do
things like den repairs, spraying primers
using the paint booth, [and] sanding using
pneumatic technology, which is air-driven
technology,” said Beteta.


For the past few months, Beteta has been
working on his project for the SkillsUSA
championship, the final-stage of a year-long
competition designed to showcase talented
students from technical schools across the
country. The competition requires students
to design a project and complete various
technical skills in front of a panel of judges.


“I made a custom snap-on toolbox. [I]
did all these different custom designs,
custom paint — everything,” said Beteta,
“I worked from A to Z on the entire thing.
The only thing that [my instructor] helped
me on was the initial design, but the rest of
it was completely my work that took about
a month in total.”


Beteta credits MCTS for having both
experienced, thoughtful instructors and
an excellent environment. His program
has around 20 people, which contributes
to a tight-knit community.


“The people… have a lot of character
[and] a lot of morals. On the first day, there
was no awkwardness. It was like
we already knew each other. We
just went into it, started doing
stuff. There was that excitement
in the air,” said Beteta.


Beteta hopes that the
instruction, internships, and
hands-on learning from MCTS
will prepare him for a career in automotive
technology.


“I plan on going into the army, an then
I’ll go into post secondary schooling...
for technology, where I can learn both
the business aspect of it and [bring] the
automotive [knowledge],” said Beteta.
“Hopefully, I can take a shot later on in
life, have enough money, and completely
fulfill my dream.”

Mercer County Technical School Student Profiles

**Across**

1. Hogwarts School of ___ and Wizardry 

6. 1.5 Volt battery 

7. It’s marked by an X 

10. I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings recently received one 

12. It’s used to make bronze, along with tin 

14. Matilda’s teacher 

16. It protects your eyes from the sun 

18. The five senses are for this 

20. The exam much of PHS is dreading 

21. If it’s after BCE 

22. It provided the boy with apples, branches, a house, and a boat. 

27. Holmes, but not Sherlock 

28. Sci-Fi author Asimov who coined “psychohistory” 

30. Nintendo’s best selling console 

31. Harper who published To Kill A Mockingbird 

33. Guthrie, but not Woody 

34. Golfer’s goal 

36. Jaws or Goosebumps, to a child 

**Down**

1. Aladdin’s first was to be a prince 

2. It’s known for being very hungry 

3. 10,000 square meters (abbreviation) 

4. They’re usually yellow in NYC 

5. Gatsby is celebrating its 100th 

8. The most famous supercalifragilisticexpialidocious user 

9. E or A’s scrabble value 

11. __ Kaplan, Pentatonix singer 

12. “__ don’t feel,” Elsa’s demand to Anna 

13. Impulse 

15. Reddit, DoorDash, and Airbnb incubator (abbreviation) 

17. The modern form of the metric system (abbreviation) 

19. Humpty Dumpty was one 

20. This type of wine or cheese is usually more expensive 

23. Technique in many video essays (abbreviation) 

24. “No”, to a Scot 

25. B, in fixed do solfège 

26. The BFG had a large one 

29. Viet - ___ 

32. Pen in most nurse’s offices 

Literary crossword

### The Courtyard

In 2023, Princeton Mayor Mark Freda, Board of Education members, and PHS staff and students gathered in PHS courtyard to celebrate the completion of a multi-year revitalization effort, with new gardens and space for activities such as reading or yoga. However, the project never quite reached the level of engagement that was hoped for.  

Then, in 2024 former PHS Science Supervisor Dr. Joy Barnes-Johnson received a climate literacy grant to revitalize the courtyards. This year, physics teacher Dr. Insu Yi and several other faculty members and PHS students are using the grant to clean up the courtyard and restore the gardens and research activity.

“The greenhouse was used a little bit for the horticulture class, and the courtyard for research. But they weren’t in great shape, let’s put it that way,” said Yi. “I began getting involved in a team that was formed based on our district grant. [The] initiative was to turn the ... courtyards into spaces for everyone — meaning classes, community groups, even outside groups — but most of the time we spent on cleaning up.”

Yi was initially hesitant to include PHS students, though he eventually began recruiting through his research and physics classes. In the future, he hopes to also include ESL and special education classes.

“I’m really interested in turning something as simple as a garden into a science project. For example, we have solar panels, but the solar panel is placed in the wrong way, so it doesn’t get sun[light],” said Yi. “I calculated with students what angle we should [have] from the horizon to the solar panels inclination, which we calculated to be about 30 degrees.”

The project has now grown to include several organizations. This includes a Generation Green team led by Dr. Andrea Dinan, director of the IDEAS center and community service programs at PHS.  The team uses the courtyard as a way to teach elementary school students about sustainability, and the collaboration of the PHS facilities and custodial staff.

“From a logistical standpoint, if you want to transport 60 bags of soil to the courtyard, you have to navigate it through the school building to get into there. The spaces had kind of fallen into a little disrepair, so there was a lot of cleaning that happened,” said Jacqueline Katz, PHS’s current Science Supervisor. “We [worked] with facilities and custodians to help us move some of the trash.” 
Katz hopes that the courtyards can continue to be accessible to PHS students in the future, whether for research projects or educational initiatives.

“We have some students interested in fruit trees, so we’re going to try to bring fruit trees into the space. And we have a student interested in vertical gardening, so he’s going to build some vertical gardens up in the greenhouse,” said Katz. 

PHS students recently celebrated the work they’ve already accomplished at a recent sustainability symposium at Monmouth University.

“It was really exciting. We got a chance to have a conversation with Tammy Murphy, who’s the governor’s wife, and she mentioned us in her speech, which was surprising and exciting,” said Raya Kondakindi ’26, a student involved in the project. “We got to communicate with people with similar sustainability goals, and it was a really engaging experience to talk with people who had experience in areas we’re looking into.” 

### The Lower Basin

As PHS students pass by the lower basin near the tennis courts, the bare patch of land is often overlooked. However, a new restoration project led by the Friends of Herrontown Woods (FOHW) and PHS students aims to bring the  basin back to life. 

The basin was first planted with turf grass to help reduce flooding in the area, and was later overplanted with native upland prairie vegetation in an attempt to transition the basin into a prairie-like ecosystem. However, due to the poor environmental conditions, the prairie system didn’t form, and the basin was instead dominated by invasive species. 

FOHW submitted a project proposal last summer for the wet meadow basin in response to Princeton Public School’s request for plant care in the area. They are now working with the PHS environmental science class to restore the basin and re-establish native species in the wet meadow. 
“We provide support. They provide us with an orderly opportunity to understand that invasive versus native [plants], and what a wet prairie is,” said James Smirk, an environmental science teacher at PHS.

The July contract grants FOHW around $6,000 for upkeep, workshops at PHS , and new signage around the basin.

The restoration process began with the removal of invasive species, including plantain weeds, and in the coming months will proceed to the over planting of native grasses like little bluestem, soft rush, and ironweed, and various wildflowers. Smirk estimates that a self-propagating basin is still around 20 years away.

Until then, the basin will be maintained through a partnership between FOHW and PHS’s environmental science classes, who use it as a resource for learning. 

“Before, I didn’t really know a lot of wetlands and how important they are to nature, and just in general to us,” said Amelie Kraft ’26, a student in Smirk’s environmental science class. “This class has definitely opened me to that, [and] I have a lot more knowledge about wetlands [and] preserves.”

PHS students play an active part in collecting ecological data and conducting their own experiments. This data–including information on native species’ distribution and location–will contribute to a long-term database helping track restoration efforts and biodiversity in the area. 

“[The] student role is always going to be data driven,” said Smirk. “We’re [going to] collect data on invertebrates, because [they] are a good indicator for the overall health of the system.”

The basin project is a smaller part of the large sustainability goal throughout Princeton, which is to build an Emerald necklace made up of interconnected green spaces and trails.

 “We would like to see that [the] emerald necklace has a component that every school is connected to,” said Smirk. “We want to build a green pathway through every property that eventually connects.”

Though vision for the emerald necklace in physical connection between nature in Princeton, Stephen Hiltner, the president of FOHW, emphasized the importance of a connection between nature and people.

“I’m hoping [the project] will spark an interest in students to start getting to know nature and all the tremendous diversity — nature is very complex, and for some people, that’s intimidating, but for me, it’s fascinating. If you love something, you want to find out as much as you can about it. I’m hoping to spark some of that,” said Hiltner.




Photo: Emily Kim

From left to right: Andrew Rivera ’25, Elizabeth Chorba ’25, Julia McGoldrick ’26, Bhavya Yaddanapuddi ’25, and Arnold Zacarias ’26 prepare soil for a garden bed.   

PHS works to bring courtyards and lower basin back to life

   With its box-office-breaking records and eye-opening perspective on Chinese animation, “Ne Zha 2” (2025) isn’t just a film — it’s a cinematic landmark in the animation world. “Ne Zha 2” is an animated fantasy movie loosely based on the 16th century novel “Investiture of the Gods” by Xu Zhonglin, and a sequel to the first movie “Ne Zha.” Written and directed by Yang Yu, or more famously known as Jiaozi, “Ne Zha 2” is a visually stunning and emotional movie. 

   Following the first movie, Ne Zha, a teenage deity, and Ao Bing, a dragon prince, are struck by lightning, which destroys their physical bodies. To prevent the destruction of their souls, Master Taiyi Zhenren uses the powers of his Seven-Colored Sacred Lotus to recreate their physical bodies. Despite the regeneration, both Ne Zha and Ao Bing’s bodies are still fragile, so Master Taiyi Zhenren advised the two to act with caution. Believing his son to be dead, Ao Bing’s father Ao Guang sends out an order for Shen Gongbao, Ao Bing’s former master, to attack Nezha’s hometown Chentang Pass. Ao Bing defends Ne Zha’s home, but unfortunately destroys his weak body in the process. 

   In order to revive Ao Bing, the Seven-Colored Sacred Lotus must be restored. As a result of a deal, Ne Zha and Ao Bing must share a body for one week, complete three trials to become immortal, and receive a potion that can restore the lotus and create a new body for Ao Bing. As the two strive to combat new challenges, secrets unravel, putting them to their friendship to the test. 

   Throughout the movie, the visuals and animations stood out to me. For example, Ne Zha and Ao Bing perfectly contrast each other, with Ne Zha designed to resemble fire and flames and Ao Bing with cool tones, symbolizing ice. Unlike in the previous movie, Ne Zha looks fiercer and more mature with fiery eyes and energy swirling around him. Ao Bing on the other hand is portrayed elegantly, his actions both smooth and regal. The visual contrast between the two characters highlights their personality differences while showing how they balance each other out. 

   Furthermore, the gods and mythical creatures were also designed intricately. Each character has their own distinct color palette, symbolic accessories, and details that are inspired by Chinese mythology. One of my favorite parts of the movie was when Immortal Wuliang led his army, the Chan sect, to fight in the battle. To show the strong bond between the army, animators depicted the Chan sect in the shape of a golden bonsai tree. The details were mesmerizing, reflecting the countless hours animators put into this project. These fascinating visuals contrast drastically with the precedent set by other Chinese animated films. While many argue that Chinese animations are often “cringy” due to immature plotlines or distinction from western familiarity, “Ne Zha 2” proves these assumptions wrong. 

   What makes this movie even more impressive is its complete dominance over the box office, grossing over $2.1 billion. Even though “Ne Zha 2” has been released for less than six months, it has reached number one on the list of highest grossing animated films, surpassing “Inside Out 2,” made by an American studio, by almost $500 million. While being an engaging movie with its visuals and colors, the movie also modernizes old folk stories, making it accessible to younger audiences. 

   “Ne Zha 2” brings China’s mythology to life through ways unlike before. The movie is a continuation that explores the personal growth of Ne Zha and the other characters through eye-opening visuals. It is a wonderful animation that truly changes the history of Chinese film-making through its visuals and record breaking gross in the animation world.

The Tower

Opinions

The Tower